Senior technical judgment, without the headcount.
Fractional CTO & Advisory
Architecture review, vendor and build-versus-buy decisions, technical due diligence, hiring, and roadmap. For companies that need the judgment of a CTO more often than they need the salary of one.
The problem this solves
You're making six-figure technology decisions on vendor claims and gut feel, because the person who could evaluate them properly doesn't work here.
What you get out of it
- Decisions backed by evaluation instead of vendor decks
- A roadmap your board and your engineers both believe
- Technical debt made visible, quantified, and scheduled
- Stronger engineering hires, screened by someone who can assess the work
What we actually hand over
- 01Standing advisory cadence with named availability
- 02Architecture and code review with written findings
- 03Build-versus-buy and vendor evaluations
- 04Board- and investor-ready technical narrative
Scope, fees, and timelines are set in a Statement of Work under our Master Services Agreement. We do not guarantee ranking, traffic, or citation outcomes — anyone who does is guessing on your behalf. We do commit to a stated methodology, a baseline captured before the work, and re-measurement on the same instrument.